Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
":wikt:emeritus" » ":wit:emeritus", ":wilt:emeritus", ":wikt:meritos", ":wikt:emerito", ":wickt:emeritus", ":winkt:emeritus"
":link:emeritus" » ":link:meritos", ":link:emerito", ":line:emeritus"
":witt:emeritus" » ":witt:meritos", ":witt:emerito", ":pitt:emeritus", ":litt:emeritus"
":wik:merits" » ":wick:merits", ":wink:merits", ":wik:meritos", ":wik:merito"

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (((":wikt:emeritus" OR ":link:emeritus") OR ":wik:merits") OR ":witt:emeritus")~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "(((\":wikt:emeritus\" OR \":link:emeritus\") OR \":wik:merits\") OR \":witt:emeritus\")".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: ((( :wikt:emeritus OR :link:emeritus ) OR :wik:merits ) OR :witt:emeritus ).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (((":wikt:emeritus" OR ":link:emeritus") OR ":wik:merits") OR ":witt:emeritus")*.